Stanford Legal

Female host is weird socially and emotionally; Anti Trump super liberal , bias, not legal news and analysis but a bias complaining podcast , this is a waste of time

I will definitely listen to this show again. I’ve spent today trying to better understand what’s going on with redistricting and gerrymandering and the redrawing democracy episode helped tremendously. I was unable to follow the entire discussion around the Louisiana case in the Supreme Court because I didn’t understand the definitions of the types of districts like majority-minority and when/how mapping entities might create them. Will look those up, read about the case, and listen to the last 10 minutes again. Thank you!

The conversations are though provoking and the topics are oh-so relevant.

once again a guest is trying to sane wah trump’s reasoning for breaking the law: she says it is either defiance or sloppiness. do any of you understand trump from all the years you have had to watch him. trump is a criminal, if there is a short cut to doing anything and the reward of it lands in his lap he doesn’t care if the act to get him there is legal, a rule, a norm, etc.! where do you think negotiation money would go, back to the gov & trump not getting any slipped into some dark shadow account? dark shadow monetary accounts are trump’s middle names.

I love these deep dives with some of the world’s best legal thinkers!. Topical and interesting!