The Story

Interesting review regarding men’s language regarding women when they think the women are not around. The constant overwrought and melodramatic “fainting” at the utterance of the “p“ word is so insincere coming from a country that allowed its young girls to be groomed by foreign men with a little care or action.

I can’t believe you have someone like Micaela Arneson reading when she can’t pronounce “proboscis”. Seriously! Where was the editor during recording. Dear-o-dear. A well written piece diminished by bad reading.

Like most media outlets (left and right) they are not even trying to show both sides

Listening from the US. You continuously refer to Persian Gulf as only gulf. Correct it, even though it may bother your sponsors. This is a biased and dis-informative podcast!

"Slanderous" hardly begins to capture the venomous portrayal of Baldoni’s character by these three! From the very start, one can hear the clear undercurrent of disdain in their words, and it’s most unsettling. Andrew, for his part, comes across as unbearably pompous as he passes judgment on Justin’s life, as though it’s beneath him. The women, too, seem to scoff at their inability to understand Justin’s vulnerability, his faith, and his causes. One might be inclined to wonder, what exactly are Andrew’s own proclivities? Surely, we might have the right to judge his inability to understand why men would choose honesty. This elderly, bald man, Andrew B, dares to call others ‘contradictory’ yet fails to grasp the most basic truth—that humans are multi-faceted. This, I would argue, is the true flaw of his character! The conflicted man, believe, is none other than Andrew himself, the true hypocrite in this entire narrative. And I must ask: Andrew, are you friends with Reynolds? What say you? Your tone reeks of irritation, bordering on jealousy, towards a man like Justin—someone who will forever remain unattainable to you. A man whose integrity and character far exceed your comprehension. Not once did you highlight anything remotely positive, and that was surely no accident. And thank you, Manveen, for pointing out the obvious. It’s evident that Andrew is neither impartial nor well-informed if he chooses to ignore Blake’s own words at the Forbes Women’s Conference, where she candidly admits to hijacking films, or the countless interviews where she is downright rude. So, the real question is this: Andrew, who hurt you?